科技部專題研究計畫主持人
MOST-108-2628-H-110-007-SSS
台灣居民及遊客知覺環境可步行性量表之建構及其和步行行為之關聯
Development of Perceived Environment Walkability Scale and Its Association with Walking Behavior for Residents and Tourists in Taiwan
科技部
Ministry of Science and Technology
國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所
Institute of Public Affairs Management, National San Yat-sen University
謝旭昇
Hsieh, Hsu-Sheng
國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所
Institute of Public Affairs Management, National San Yat-sen University
謝旭昇
助理教授
+886-75252000 Ext.4908
hs.hsieh@mail.nsysu.edu.tw
計畫執行期間起:2019-08-01
計畫執行期間迄:2020-07-31
2019-08-01
2019-08-31
台灣居民(西部區域:北、中、南部,不含外島)
1
001
01
知覺環境可步行性;步行行為;通勤步行;休閒步行;建成環境
perceived environment walkability;walking behavior;commuting walking;leisure walking;built environment
「知覺環境可步行性」(perceived environment walkability)反映了個體對於步行環境中客觀特徵的回應,從而作為個體步行旅次發生的重要影響因素,且可取代因個體生活及旅運環境差異而不易調查的客觀環境可步行性。本研究以鄰里環境可步行性量表為基礎(Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale),建構針對臺灣通勤和休閒步行的知覺環境可步行性測量指標。透過面訪問卷調查,蒐集了399名台灣西部區域各縣市的受測者之通勤和休閒步行行為,以及知覺環境可步行性因素,包含:(1)居住密度、(2)土地使用混合度─多樣性、(3)土地使用混合度─可及性、(4)街道連結性、(5)步行設施、(6)美學、(7)行人/交通安全、(8)治安、(9)物理障礙。藉此,本研究找出知覺環境可步行性因素和步行環境之關聯,以及通勤步行和休閒步行的決定因素之間的差異。
Perceived environment walkability reflecting individual reactions to objective features in the walking environment may play important role in individual walk trip generation, and can replace objective environment walkability that is difficult to investigate across individuals with different living and travel environments. This research aimed to establish perceived environment walkability measures for commuting and leisure walking in Taiwan, revised from the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS). In data collection, 399 respondents across different county/city in western Taiwan were interviewed based on a face-to-face questionnaire survey to obtain their self-report commuting and leisure walking behavior for one week, and perceptions of environment walkability in the nine factors, containing (1) residential density, (2) land use mix-diversity, (3) land use mix-access, (4) street connectivity, (5) walking facilities, (6) aesthetics, (7) pedestrian/traffic safety, (8) crime safety, and (9) physical obstruction. In consequence, the associations between the perceived environment walkability factors and walking behavior and the difference between the determining factors of commuting and leisure walking were identified.
否,無直接識別資料
除檢查有無可識別個人身份資料外,另檢查個案編號是否重複、變項及選項數值說明是否與問卷一致或未被定義,發現前述狀況時,將於確認後協助修改。
追蹤清單
下載(0)
申請(0)
遠距(0)