1
3
E10046
3
018
假釋參考指標之預測效度檢驗與應用
The Test of Predictive Validity and Application of Parole Reference Guidelines
1.陳玉書
1.Yu-shu Chen
1.中央警察大學
1.Central Police University
001,002,003,004
1.中央警察大學
1.Central Police University
002
1.科技部
1.Ministry of Science and Technology
A.14 計畫執行期間(起):2011-08-01
A.14 計畫執行期間(訖):2014-07-31
2012-08-062014-12-28
A.16 收到日期:2015-12-15
1
2004年1月至6月間矯正機關假釋之成年男、女受刑人。

1
236

236
001
C.2 聯絡日期:2015-12-21
2
1.中央警察大學
1.Central Police University
1
C.7 資料公開日期:2025-01-01
2
008
1
2
1
1
3
3
001
  我國刑法在民國1994年至2006年短短數年間即修法三次,其主要原因為假釋再犯問題與社會治安考量; 假釋政策的穩定性和變革不僅關係到受刑人權益,亦將影響民眾和社會的安全。本研究延續2004-2006年間960位假釋出監受刑人於2012-2014年進行追蹤調查,其主要目的在了解假釋受刑人出監後再犯與適應狀況。共計追蹤完成236名樣本。主要調查內涵包括: (1)官方資料: 2007-2011年再犯資料、2007-2011年再犯類型; (2)調查資料: 個人特性、就業狀況、家庭/配偶依附與支持、家庭/配偶衝突、偏差友伴、同儕依附、生活壓力、因應策略、生活型態、偏差與犯罪行為、犯罪被害、鄰里關係、更生協助、更生面臨問題、監禁影響、處遇經驗、更生保護經驗。

  Due to the parole recidivism and consideration of social order, the penal law related to parole policy had been revised three times between 1994 and 2006. The stability and innovation of parole policy not only influence the rights of inmates in the correctional facilities, but also impact public and social safety in our society. Samples of the current study were collected from 960 paroles released from prisons in 2004. 236 respondents were tracked and finished the survey between 2011 and 2014. Measurements of this study are as follows: (1)official data: recidivism between 2007-2011. (2)Survey data: individual characteristics, occupational situation, family/spouse attachment/support, family/spouse conflict, deviant peers, peer attachment, life stress, coping, life style, self-reported deviant behaviors/crimes, victimization, neighbor relationship, needs

roblems of rehabilitation, and influence of imprison, treatment

arole experiences.

D.16 完成檢誤日期:2016-05-13
D.17 預定釋出日期:2025-01-01
D.18 初次釋出日期:2025-01-01
D.19_1 最新版釋出日期:2025-01-01
2
1
追蹤清單
下載(0)
申請(0)
遠距(0)