1
3
E91071
3
009
要求—控制權—支持(DCS)與努力:報酬失衡(ERI)模式對創新行為影響之研究
The Innovation Behavior Influenced by Demand-control-support (DCS) and Effort-reward-imbalance (ERI) Models
1.繆敏志
1.Min-chih Miao
1.中國文化大學企業管理學系暨研究所
1.Department of Business Administration, Chinese Culture University
001,002,003,004
1.中國文化大學企業管理學系暨研究所
1.Department of Business Administration, Chinese Culture University
002
1.行政院國家科學委員會
1.National Science Council
A.14 計畫執行期間(起):2002-08-01
A.14 計畫執行期間(訖):2003-07-31
2003-03-202003-04-20
A.16 收到日期:2004-03-02
2
新竹科學園區廠商之研發人員

1

239


239
004
01
C.2 聯絡日期:2004-03-09
2
1.中國文化大學企業管理學系暨研究所
1.Department of Business Administration, Chinese Culture University
1
C.7 資料公開日期:2005-08-01
2
008
2
1
1
2
1
3
3
001
1,2
1.努力-報酬失衡模式
2.要求-控制權-支持模式
3.創新行為
1.Effort-reward Imbalance Model
2.Innovation Behavior
3.Job Demand-control Model
 本研究旨在探討DCS與ERI模式對研發人員創新行為的主要、二因子交互及三因子交互效果。本研究得到下列兩項主要發現:1. 在DCS模式方面,高控制權者的創新行為較高;但低要求/低控制權與高要求/低控制權者的創新行為較低;低要求/低控制權/高支持、低要求/低控制權/低 支持與高要求/低控制權/低支持者的創新行為較低。2. 在ERI模式方面,高過度承諾者的創新行為較高;但低努力/低報酬/低承諾者的創新行為較低,低努力/高報酬/高承諾者的創新行為較高。由於DCS模式二 因子交互效果的解釋力較ERI模式略佳,且能部分支持緊張假設、孤立緊張假設與綜效緩衝假設。兩相對照,仍應以DCS模式較能預測創新行為。

 The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of main, two-way interaction and three-way interaction of the DCS and ERI models on R&D workers’ innovation behavior. Two major findings of this study were: 1. In DCS model, control had positive effect on workers’ innovation behavior, but low demand / low control and high demand / low control had negative effects on workers’ innovation behavior, low demand / low control / high support, low demand / low control / low support and high demand / low control / low support had negative effects on workers’ innovation behavior. 2. In ERI model, high overcommitment had positive effect on innovation behavior, low effort / high reward / low overcommitment had negative effect on workers’ innovation behavior, but low demand / high reward / high overcommitment had positive effect on workers’ innovation behavior. The two-way interaction effect of DCS model was better than ERI model, and it could partly support strain hypothesis, iso-strain hypothesis and synergy buffer hypothesis. Therefore, the DCS model was better than ERI model to predict R&D workers’ innovation behavior.

D.16 完成檢誤日期:2004-08-10
D.17 預定釋出日期:2005-08-01
D.18 初次釋出日期:2005-08-01
D.19_1 最新版釋出日期:2005-08-01
1
1
1
2
1,3
10.6141/TW-SRDA-E91071-1
http://efenci.srda.sinica.edu.tw/webview/index.jsp?object=http://efenci.srda.sinica.edu.tw:80/obj/fStudy/E91071
追蹤清單
下載(0)
申請(0)
遠距(0)