1
3
E89105
1
007
台灣地區高爾夫球場評鑑標準之研究
The Study of Evaluation of Golf Courses in Taiwan
1.施致平
1.Chih-pin Shih
1.國立臺灣師範大學體育學系
1.Department of Physical Education, National Taiwan Normal University
001,002,003,004
1.國立臺灣師範大學體育學系
1.Department of Physical Education, National Taiwan Normal University
002
1.行政院國家科學委員會
1.National Science Council
A.14 計畫執行期間(起):2000-08-01
A.14 計畫執行期間(訖):2001-07-31
A.16 收到日期:2001-10-29
1
1.一般球友 2.PGA選手 3.國內高爾夫球賽之主辦單位

1

391


391
001
01
C.2 聯絡日期:2001-10-31
2
1.國立臺灣師範大學體育學系
1.Department of Physical Education, National Taiwan Normal University
1
C.7 資料公開日期:2001-08-01
2
008
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
001
1,2
1.高爾夫
2.高爾夫球場
3.高爾夫球場之評鑑標準
4.高爾夫球場之經營管理
1.Golf
2.Golf Courses
3.Golf Courses Management
4.Standards for Assessing Golf Courses
本研究旨於發展台灣地區高爾夫球場之評鑑標準量表。本量表分為兩大方向:一、高爾夫球場之場地規劃與設計;二、高爾夫球場之經營與管理。本研究依 Babbie(1990)對測量標準之信度(Reliability)與效度(Validity)的要求,驗證台灣地區高爾夫球場之評鑑標準量表是符合信 度與效度。 在高爾夫球場之評鑑標準量表信度的實證方面:本研究所採用Cronbach alpha值來定義內部一致性,亦即高爾夫球場評鑑標準之信度。本研究運用問卷調查法,以分層抽樣的方式將母體體分為一般球友、高爾夫球賽主辦單位與職業 選手,針對量表中之評鑑指標進行評估。經結果顯示,整體之評鑑標準Cronbach alpha為0.95,故於統計上證實,此評鑑標準具有相當的信度。 在效度驗證方面:本研究驗證此量表之表面效度(Face Validity)、內容效度(Content Validity)、效標關連效度(Criterion- Related Validity)與鑑別效度(Construct Validity)之測試。採用文獻回顧法、專家座談及開放式問卷,調查國內外高爾夫球場評鑑制度與制度落實之情況、現階段高爾夫球場經營模式與所遭遇之 困境、以及目前國內外各級比賽主辦者對球場的要求等方向,做廣度及深度的修正,並將其加入目前國際間所積極推動之評鑑標準,確立評鑑與認證的標準內容,為 相關領域之人士所認定之表面效度,並具有廣度與深度之內容效度。在效標關連效度與鑑別效度的證實方面:本研究運用問卷調查法,以分層抽樣的方式方將母群體 分為一般球友、高爾夫球賽主辦單位與職業選手,針對量表中評鑑指標的進行評估。整體之效標關連效度與鑑別效度良好,但量表的第二部分:高爾夫球場的經營與 管理之鑑別效度並不顯著,冀希後續研究。整體而言信、效度皆符合要求。

The purpose of this study was to establish a golf course rating system in Taiwan. The rating system included two damnations: 1. Golf course planning and design; 2. Golf course management. The study applied Babbie’s(1990) theory to verify the reliability and validity of the golf course rating system. To verify reliability, the researchers surveyed golf players, sponsors of golf tournament, and professional golfers. The results showed that Coefficient alpha reliability estimates all exceed 0.95. To prove validity, the researchers reviewed relevant literature and established focus groups to discuss the face and content validity of this rating system. The results indicated that the face and content validity of the rating system were satisfied. The researchers also surveyed golf players, sponsors of golf tournament, and professional golfers to verify criterion-related validity and construct validity. The criterion-related and construct validity of rating system were significant. However, the sub-rating system, golf management, was not significant in construct validity. The researchers suggested that the following studies may improve the construct validity in the rating system. Overall, the reliability and validity of “Golf Course Rating System in Taiwan” were satisfied.

D.16 完成檢誤日期:2003-12-17
D.17 預定釋出日期:2003-12-31
D.18 初次釋出日期:2004-03-15
D.19_1 最新版釋出日期:2004-03-15
1
1
1
2
1,3
10.6141/TW-SRDA-E89105-1
http://efenci.srda.sinica.edu.tw/webview/index.jsp?object=http://efenci.srda.sinica.edu.tw:80/obj/fStudy/E89105
追蹤清單
下載(0)
申請(0)
遠距(0)