1
3
E88097
3
004
環境指標設計文字與色彩視認性之研究:以門牌號碼設計為例
A Study on the Legibility of the Text and Colors in the Environmental Sign Design: A Case Study on the Doorplate Design
1.嚴貞
1.Jen Yen
1.國立雲林科技大學視覺傳達設計系
1.Department of Visual Communication, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology
001,002,003,004
1.國立雲林科技大學視覺傳達設計系
1.Department of Visual Communication, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology
002
1.行政院國家科學委員會
1.National Science Council
A.14 計畫執行期間(起):1998-08-01
A.14 計畫執行期間(訖):1999-07-31
A.16 收到日期:1999-11-08
3
年齡17-60歲

1
160

160
097
01
C.2 聯絡日期:1999-11-08
2
1.國立雲林科技大學視覺傳達設計系
1.Department of Visual Communication, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology
1
C.7 資料公開日期:2001-08-01
2
008
2
1
1
1
2
3
3
001
1,2
1.字體
2.色彩
3.易讀性
4.門牌設計
5.視認性
6.號誌設計
1.Character Type
2.Color
3.Doorplate Design
4.Legibility
5.Sign Design
本研究以文獻探討、訪談與調查研究法進行門牌號碼文字與色彩視認性之研究。主要目的在探討門牌號碼設計中,視認性最佳的字體、字間及色彩的組合,並同時比較 設計背景與非設計背景者對字體選擇是否有差異、不同年齡層對中文字體及阿拉伯數字的視認性是否有差異、不同性別與不同年齡層對色彩的視認性是否有差異。研 究結果可提供戶政事務所等相關單位較客觀的參考數據,以及視覺傳達設計實務和教學上之參考。本研究實驗設計的視認性調查與測試分為三個階段:第一階段是中 文字體視認性調查,由具設計背景與非設計背景各30人進行調查。第二階段為中文字體及阿拉伯數字視認性測試,受測對象為年齡17~60歲160人。第三階 段門牌之文數字與色彩視認性測試,受試對象年齡為17至60歲,共計117人。所得主要結論如下: 1.較適合應用於門牌號碼的字體依序為特粗楷體、特粗明體、粗圓體、特粗黑體。 2.視認距離為20m、字高5cm的阿拉伯數字與視認距離為10.5m、字高3cm的中文字體,以特粗黑體視認性較佳。視認距離為12.5m、字高 3.5cm的中文字體,在黑底白字的情況下,以粗圓體視認性較佳。 3.文字間距對門牌號碼視認性的影響並無顯著差異。 4.視認性最佳的門牌號碼色彩組合依序為「藍底白字」、「紅底白字」、「黑底白字」、「綠底白字」。視認性最差的色彩組合為「紫底黃字」與「白底褐字」。 不同年齡層對色彩視認性之影響,P=.000(P<.05)其差異達顯著水準。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effective legibility of the different viewing distances, sizes, typefaces, leadings and colors on the doorplate design. The comparison of the effective legibility between different professional background, ages and sextures are also made. The literature review, deep interviewing, and survey research methods are utilized. There are three steps in this study. The first step is an investigation on the effective legibility of Chinese typeface proceeded with 30 design background and 30 non-design background subjects. The second step is a test for the effective legibility of the Chinese typefaces and Arabic numerals. A total of 160 subjects vary in different ages are tested. The third step is a test for the effective legibility of text and colors on doorplate. There are total 117 subjects tested. The major findings of the study are: (1) the most appropriate typefaces on doorplate are Bold Kai, Bold Ming, Bold Round, Bold Helvetica; (2) the most effective legibility of the typeface is Bold Helvetica when the Arabic numeral are 5cm height in 20m legible distance and 3cm height in 10.5m legible distance; (3) no significant differences are found between the leading of the text and the effect of the legibility; (4) the most legible colors collocation are white type in blue, red, black and green background, and the poorest legible color are yellow type in purple background and brown type in white background; (5) significant differences are found between among different-age test in the effective legibility of the color collocation.

D.16 完成檢誤日期:2001-04-18
D.17 預定釋出日期:2001-08-01
D.18 初次釋出日期:2001-08-01
D.19_1 最新版釋出日期:2001-08-01
1
1
1
2
1,1,3
10.6141/TW-SRDA-E88097-1
http://efenci.srda.sinica.edu.tw/webview/index.jsp?object=http://efenci.srda.sinica.edu.tw:80/obj/fStudy/E88097
追蹤清單
下載(0)
申請(0)
遠距(0)