1
3
E87080
3
003
兩岸產業組織環境差異下子公司產業網路管理模式調適策略
The Managerial Adaption of Industrial Coorperative Network for Mainland Subsidiaries under the Discrepency of Business Environment between Taiwan and Mainland
1.胡哲生
1.Jer-san Hu
1.國立雲林科技大學企管管理技術系
1.Department of Business Administration , National Yunlin University of Science & Technology
001,002,003,004
1.國立雲林科技大學企管管理技術系
1.Department of Business Administration , National Yunlin University of Science & Technology
002
1.行政院國家科學委員會
1.National Science Council
A.14 計畫執行期間(起):1997-08-01
A.14 計畫執行期間(訖):1998-07-31
A.16 收到日期:1999-01-18
2
經濟部中衛發展中心之中心廠與衛星廠名單

1

98


98
003
01
C.2 聯絡日期:1999-01-18
2
1.國立雲林科技大學企管管理技術系
1.Department of Business Administration ,National Yunlin University of Science & Technology
1
C.7 資料公開日期:2000-08-01
2
008
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
001
1,2
1.大陸投資
2.中衛體系
3.產業協力
1.Central-satellite System
2.Industrial Associative Network
3.Mainland Investment
本研究主要在探討具有中衛協力關係的廠商赴大陸投資時,既有中衛關係對其之束縛或助益;並進一步瞭解中衛廠商共同遭遇的海外經營問題,中衛產業是否因此而產 生關聯性的產業投資演變;最後再分析台商對外投資後,既有中衛關係的可能演變;及台商集體化對外投資後,在大陸新建中衛關係的問題與發展。綜合分析發現, 本研究得到下列結果: 1.中衛體系廠商赴大陸投資,並不因為其既有的合作關係或能力條件而有差異,總計約有六成中衛廠商,因兩岸環境的客觀差異而決定赴大陸投資。 2.已在大陸投資之中衛廠商約有五成多比例,係併同至大陸投資,另有約四成多,為單獨性投資,其中衛星廠佔30%,中心廠佔10%左右;顯示台灣企業仍有 相當數量廠商,並不因為身處中衛體系而延遲投資決策;且其採取併同投資的行為,亦不因為所處中衛體系性質而有所影響。 3.中衛體系廠商在台灣既有的合作經驗,讓中心廠與衛星廠對評選協力廠,有相當的共識與經驗基礎;除了成品組裝類協力體系,因其本身著重成品製造,所以對 衛星廠在多項製造能力方面頗為重視外,其他類中衛體系觀念較為一致。 4.中衛體系內的併同投資考量,衛星廠較重視對方的財務支援能力及原訂契約的型態;並且對雙方的合作活動,中心廠較倚重成本控制、開發產品、產品與製程技 術研發及對市場顧客服務等合作內容,而衛星廠則在意雙方開發產品及交貨供貨管理配合等合作。 5.大體而言,中心廠對提供協同投資者輔導服務,不若衛星廠所強烈需要,衛星廠較重視資本投資決策、自動化、電腦化等方面的輔導。 6.中衛體系廠商對大陸廠商的協力合作能力普遍認為不佳,尤其中心廠因為身居協力體系中心,對合作者能力要求較嚴,故不滿意項目較多。另外,以製造成品為 主要合作標的的中衛廠商,因為重視製造配合,該體系內之中心廠對甚多經營能力項目,普遍認為不足。

This study hopes to explore the reality of investing behaviors for industrial associative network in mainland , and the possible support or obstacles to the investors caused by this relations. At the end , it should assess the changes of established industrial associative relations after the members’ investment outbound and the possible new industrial network in Mainland. After the depth interview and analysis of question data, this study got conclusions as: 1.The motivations of associative members investing in Mainland are same, no matter what relations patterns and cooperation behavior are. The objective environmental differences between Taiwan and Mainland are main influential factors for sixty percent investors. 2.There are about half investors of associative member behave their decision with their partners, especially the central firm. For the else, they decided to invest by themselves, thirty of investors are peripheral firms, ten are central firms. It means that the investing decision, for most cases, were not influenced by the network relations. 3.The associative cooperation experience in Taiwan provide peripheral and central firms common knowledge basis to evaluate the cooperative feasibility of potential partners in Mainland. The central firms which stand final product assemble role emphasize on partners’ manufacturing ability. 4.For the investing binding with cooperators’ decisions, the peripheral firm relies on central firms financial support and commitments of original agreement. In the cooperation period, the central firms demand the support from counterparts about cost reduction、product or process development、customer services. On the counterparts, peripheral firms concern about product joint-development and matching of inventory management. 5.Peripheral firms demand consulting and helps, if they invest with central firms, for the topics as capital planning, automation and computerization. 6.Most members of associative system evaluate potential cooperators in Mainland domestic market for the sake of managerial ability at under-level, especially in the central firms judgments.

D.16 完成檢誤日期:1999-11-16
D.17 預定釋出日期:2004-03-23
D.18 初次釋出日期:2004-03-23
D.19_1 最新版釋出日期:2004-03-23
1
1
1
2
1,3
10.6141/TW-SRDA-E87080-1
https://efenci.srda.sinica.edu.tw/webview/index.jsp?object=https://efenci.srda.sinica.edu.tw:80/obj/fStudy/E87080
追蹤清單
下載(0)
申請(0)
遠距(0)